Essay on The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God.

St Anselm’s ontological argument is a deductive, priori, analytic argument which seeks to establish the existence of God by understanding the attributes of God in the sense of classic theism. Anselm wrote his Proslogion as a prayer originally, but it later became an argument for God by establishing his attributes.

St. Anselm's Ontological Argument Essay 973 Words 4 Pages It is important to show why the topic you are discussing is important, especially if there are other topics that could be studied in place of the one you are discussing. In this case, the discussion is on Saint Anselm and his Ontological Argument.

Anselm wanted to prove the existence of God, so he proposed the ontological argument. The ontological argument is deductive, and uses a priori reasoning. This means that it starts with a statement that is known to be true solely through definition (God is the greatest conceivable being) and develops the implications of this statement in order to reach a reasonable conclusion.

Ontological Argument: St. Anselm Essay 778 Words 4 Pages In the piece of Ontological Argument, St. Anselm argues that being able to exist in both reality and in understanding is the best to humans. He specifically focuses on the topic of an omnient God.

Analysis of Anselm’s Ontological Argument Essay. This premise does not state that God’s strengths as this argument is to prove his existence, not whether or not God is all-powerful, all-knowing and all-good. The second premise means this greatest possible being is either an imaginary being that one has thought of or, a being that we not.

Anselm’s ontological argument, sourced from the “Proslogium” (with himself as the author), is a highly controversial argument that aims to prove the existence of God. This argument is an attempt of an a priori proof, that which uses purely uses intuition and reasoning alone (Oppy G. 1996).

Anselm, Archbishop of Canterbury first set forth the Ontological Argument in the eleventh century. This argument is the primary locus for such philosophical problems as whether existence is a property and whether or not the notion of necessary existence is intelligible.

Outline the Ontological argument for the existence of God and consider the view that, while it may strengthen a believer’s faith, it has no value for the non-believer. The word “ontology” is a Greek word relating to the concept of being.

And finally there is one more strong criticism where Anselm's argument fails: Concept of a Maximally Great Being. As is clearly evident, the ontological argument rests on the assumption that the concept of God, as it is described in the argument, is self-consistent. But many philosophers are skeptical about this underlying assumption.

The ontological argument is a group of different philosophers arguments for the existence of God. “Ontological” literally means talking about being and so in this case, that being is the existence or being of God. The main component of the Ontological argument can be found in the Anselm’s “Proslogion” which is a short work that tries to demonstrate both the existence and the nature.

I just revised moral argument for existence to God and read through an essay I wrote on ontological argument today, so my knowledge aint that great, but I'd personally elaborate on the two forms of the argument a bit more, as the question relates to explaining the argument, and it seems you've only written several sentences for both forms of Anselm's.

Norman Malcolm revived the ontological argument in 1960 when he located a second, stronger ontological argument in Anselm's work; Alvin Plantinga challenged this argument and proposed an alternative, based on modal logic. Attempts have also been made to validate Anselm's proof using an automated theorem prover.